|
Real Estate Q&A
>
Disclosures
| When
buying a home, if there has been flooding that results in damage and
it has not been fixed, must that be disclosed to the buyer? Does this
need to be disclosed if 1. The buyer does not ask about flooding. 2.
the Buyer does ask about flooding? |
|
. |
| Disclosure rules vary
from state to state, but most require the seller to disclose any
problems he knows about. However, the rules on disclosure vary
according to whether the seller is an individual or a bank, and
whether they are represented by an agent or not. Rules on disclosure
are not as strict for bank-owned properties and FSBO's.
If you received a "Transfer Disclosure
Statement" from the seller, then you probably live in a state that
requires disclosure. Go back through your documents and see if you
have such a form. Whether the buyer asks about flooding should be
immaterial - if a seller knows about a problem, they should disclose
it. |
|
. |
| If
the real estate agent representing the Buyer knows of a flooding
problem, must they disclose this information to the buyer? Is it
unethical if they do not? |
|
. |
| Real estate agents are
not going to be as familiar with a property as the seller. If you
received a Transfer Disclosure Statement and either the listing agent
or the selling agent knew of a problem not listed by the seller, they
should have added it to the form. It is generally required that they
do so. However, they may not have known - and they cannot disclose
problems they don't know about or that were concealed by the seller.
In addition, there are several
safeguards that should help you determine if there was water damage or
not - termite inspections often point out areas of wood rot caused by
water damage - almost all Realtors recommend that a buyer order his
own professional home inspection by a professional - and if there was
roof damage, an appraiser sometimes can point that out in the
appraisal - though it is not their job to perform a full inspection. |
|
. |
|